5/29/2005

I hear a lot of things about the media these days. Heck, I say a lot of things about the media. There's a lot of talk about bias, how the mainstream media needs to get rid of their bias. That's a bunch of crap. The academic community discovered about 15 years ago that bias is inherent in any form of observation. This includes scientists, who are finally ditching the old-school concept that science is objective. Forget about it.

Let's look at this realistically: it's not a very good idea to preach an overhaul of the entire media system. Personally, I think that would achieve the best results, but let's not go there. It's not feasible. What is feasible, though - and precedent has again been set by the academic community - is disclosure of bias.

When doing a piece on a controversial subject, don't try to present both sides equally. (I guess this is a moot point since nobody really tries to do this anyway.) Stick your neck out and state your position. Everyone has an agenda. The New York Times should proudly proclaim itself a bastion of liberal progressivism. The Wall Street Journal should be printed on sheets of money. CNN should put a little picture of Ted Turner in the corner with the caption, "We Do What He Says." NPR should announce at the top of every hour that their programming is made possible "by pseudo-intellectual rich white people, for pseudo-intellectual rich white people".

Let us know exactly what you think. Don't try to obscure any semblance of subjectivity with statistics and sound bites. And when you make your opinionated arguments - which I hope you will - don't go all ad hominem on us. The other side is not morally corrupt, or evil, or idiots. (Although I have to digress for a minute and say that Sen. Sam Brownback has got to be the biggest idiot I have ever laid eyes on. You're gonna try and tell Arlen Specter that he's not allowed to look for a cure for cancer because you have too many hang-ups about experimenting with embryos that were just going to be destroyed anyway? Arlen Specter is from TEXAS, man! He does not play around! If I was him I would have reached across the table and done a Rick James across your face, with George Stephanopoulos cheering me on. Next time, keep your big dumb Kansan mouth shut.)

Note: the above in no way constitues an endorsement of Sen. Specter, although his website paints him up as a pretty cool dude. Also, he's not from Texas. My bad. But since Pennsylvania doesn't have the same ring to it, and also because it is currently unknown whether people from Pennsylvania "play around", I have decided not to correct this mistake. Also, strangely enough, Sen. Specter was born and raised in Kansas. At this point, any legitimate reporter or political commentator would have stricken the entire parenthetical aside from the record. But I just don't roll like that. I keeps it real.

Another note: Rick James has some cool music, man. I'm not talking about "Superfreak", I'm talking about "Give It To Me, Baby" (which Jay-Z and the Neptunes shamelessly ripped off!), and "Mary Jane", and "Cold Blooded". Check him out, all you paid-monthly-music-subscription-subscribers!

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting, so what your saying is it could go either direction?

Liberal For Life

2:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I'M RICK JAMES, BITCH!!!"
-Rick James' Ghost

4:22 PM  

Post a Comment

5/28/2005

I hereby propose that Guns N Roses were the Limp Bizkit of their time. Don't believe me? Here's the facts:

-Both bands played loud and flashy music
-Both bands were only popular for a short time
-Both bands have a small but fanatical fanbase that insists they are still popular
-Two less-than-brilliant frontmen
-Two freaky-looking guitar players
-Both bands shared a tendency to do terrible covers

Need I say more?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/27/2005

Orson Scott card is funny, like a clown. He is here to amuse you.

Commentary (Farkentary? Frankenberry? Mmm, Frankenberry)

There are some good points in there, somewhere. I just wish they weren't obscured by all the jingoism. And what's that stuff about CBS hating Mormons? Methinks someone has been exposed to science fiction for too long.

1 Comments:

Blogger Rachel said...

What's really sad is that this is the kind of debate that is coming out of this whole mess, rather than a discussion over the cases of Quran desecration that were confirmed. Not to mention all the other issues with prisoner abuse in Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and elsewhere.

I guess I should just go back to Smartland where I can bitch about it.

BTW, I much prefer Count Chocula.

5:09 PM  

Post a Comment

I have forgotten how frustrating recording can be. I'm trying to make demos for all the new songs I have, and it's going very slowly. I still got the dope skillz for the phat beatz, so that's good. And I've figured out a better way to record and mix them. But I spent like an hour trying to experiment with this idea I had for recording guitar that just didn't pan out. I think my delay pedal has serious problems because I can never get reasonable levels out of it. I wonder.

That's about it. My life has slowed down considerably since school let out. It picked up yesterday because I got the Chappelle Show Season 2 DVD. I've watched everything except the special features. It's great.

Ok. Well, it's time to get back to "work". I'll post stuff here if I manage to produce something remotely listenable.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/25/2005



Here's an update for you: I don't know why I like this record. It's very preachy and self-indulgent, Conor's voice is super-shaky (almost as if he doesn't like the idea of singing at all), and the songs themselves are all pretty similar. (There's even a fabulous pun involved when I realized the familiar tune that closes the disc was appropriately titled "Road to Joy".)

But ... I like it. I imagine this is the exception rather than the rule, because I have Digital Ash in a Digital Urn and I think that one is a giant turd. Cool electronic sounds, but basically still country songs. I guess I can applaud the effort.

Ok, Conor, you Midwestern freak show. You win this round.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/21/2005

Does anyone else find it curious that movies - which are a passive form of entertainment - are continuously re-released and preserved in multiple formats, while video games - which are an active form of entertainment - are discontinued very quickly and considered obsolete every few years? If someone wanted to do a report on the movies people watched in 1935, they could easily locate information on every movie that was released that year, and probably get a good number of them on VHS or DVD. On the other hand, if that same person wanted to do a report on the video games people played in 1985, while it would be possible to find information on which games were released that year, it would be nearly impossible to procure working examples of a fraction of those games. Even limiting the scope of research to just PC games or just Nintendo games would still mean hundreds of games lost to history.

The holy grail among gamers is rediscovering the games of their youth. I got rid of my Nintendo long ago, and while I have a Genesis and a Super NES somewhere gathering dust, they are mostly useless since I preferred to rent games rather than buy them. Sometimes I just want to sit down and play Warsong, or Final Fantasy II, or Metroid. So what am I supposed to do? Some games have been reissued; the only significant ones have been the Final Fantasy series and Chrono Trigger, which were released for the PS1. Everything else is gone. PC Emulators have helped to fill this gap and also to preserve these games, which I think is certainly just as important as preserving the movies of our time. But they are tricky to use, some games aren't available, and emulation is not supported by the original manufacturers. It won't be enough until there is a centralized movement within the industry to recognize the importance of preserving video games.

We've come a long way since Pong and Atari and even Super Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog. 25 years ago, gaming was a different story. The primary market was arcade machines, and home gaming was just beginning. The industry incorporated new technology as it was happening, and as a result games improved very quickly. New games rolled out every year that put the old ones to shame, and so the idea of tossing out the old to make way for the new became the standard that is still in place today.

The problem is, the fact that Timesplitters 3 rocks so much does not diminish the quality of the first two. If and when Final Fantasy XXII comes out, I will still cherish the time I spent playing the very first one. And I will still want to play it, no matter what. That's why I want to see old games preserved. It's beginning to happen - the Atari joysticks that plug into your TV, the various arcade collections - and I think the video game companies are starting to realize that preserving and reissuing games is both historically and financially beneficial to them.

7 Comments:

Blogger Justin said...

They need to standardize re-releases and compilations. Those joystick things are a good idea, but it's kind of cheesy. Wouldn't the whole collection fit nicely on one or two DVDs?

The new Nintendo system, the Revolution, is said to be able to download N64 and SNES games to its hard drive. I've noticed that EB has a wide selection of games for many older systems. Even Blockbuster has a huge focus on older games and systems.

You're right about the older games. However, since I started playing Timesplitters 2 first, when I went back to TS1, all I could do was see how much better TS2 was. I'm sure TS1 was great in its day and age, but I can't really play it. That won't be true with TS3, though, and I'm certain I'll go back to TS2 periodically.

But, with things the way they are, you can go and drop $50 or so and get a lot of games that were popular on a system you didn't have and experience them for a fourth of their original price (like I did with the N64).

I picked up the PS2 port of Serious Sam today at Target. I read that it was horrible, but it was on clearance for $2.48. Heheheheheh

4:16 PM  
Blogger Dan Martinez said...

The reason why video games can't be revived like movies is because movies can much easily create emotional appeal and attachment.

People who like to watch an old movie can enjoy it for what it is and savor it's antiquity, but so can people who enjoy old video games. I just bought the Legend of Zelda Collector's Pack for CameGube which has the first 2 Zelda games on it, plus two from Nintendo 64.

But the difference is, I think, that movies being "old" or "new" is defined more than by just the technology used at the time to film it. It's so easy to pick out a TV show as being filmed in the 80's, they just have that distinct feel to them. But a video game is defined much more by the technology used to create it.

My point is, that just because a movie is old, it's ultimately about the characters and the story. The same is theoretically true for video games, but in actuallity is not true - for your average player on your average game. Sure, you're always going to have your old childhood favorite, or whatever. But otherwise, video games are all about "oh-ah" appeal. It's near to impossible to get someone in a younger generation to appreciate an 8 bit NES game. It just doesn't "look cool" or is doesn't "do as much cool stuff" as newer games. Video games sell because they look awesome and are fun for a while. Great movies remain great movies because they touch us in a way video games cannot.

And also, there's the real reason: girls tend to watch movies more than play video games.

4:40 PM  
Blogger Brandon said...

Sorry but I must throw my hat back into the ring here. I strongly believe games can create as much emotional appeal and attachment as movies do. Even more so, because they are an active form of entertainment. You have to think; they engage much more of your brain than watching a movie does.

I love the feel of the first two Zelda games for the NES. It's not just a link to my childhood (no pun intended), it is representative of a time when technology was limited, so designers had to make do with what they had. There are things about those games that are incredibly creative for their time.

Sure, there are flashy video games. A lot of appeal to your average gamer will come from that kind of hype. But what about movies? That's most of the market these days. And old movies aren't all brilliant masterpieces. Some of them were all flash and hype in their time.

I also have to disagree about your statement that great movies reach us in a way games cannot. I have much more pleasant memories of certain games than I do of movies. Some of those old games had great storylines, some had unique elements, and some were just super fun to play.

Finally, girls watch more movies than play games now, but that gap is closing fast. And have you ever tried to beat Denise at Dr Mario? I rest my case.

6:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First of all, you always intend puns, and I think you do a disservice to al of us when you claim otherwise. Finally, I think that in general, for the general population movies do hold much more emmotional attachment than games. I think I can safely assume that a far larger and broader group of people were touched by 'Saving Private Ryan' ( a very emmotional movie), than were touched by say 'Star Ocean 2' (which may or may not have been an emmotional game, it goes further to prove my point that games tend not to be the emmotional markers that movies are). I think associating "activity" and "engagement" with emmotional impact and memorability is a flawed assumption. I think in general people are far more impacted by a movie which takes them away from reality, or makes them think.

As someone who personally makes a lot of use of escapism, I have to say that I work much harder to immerse myself in a well-written game than it's movie counterpart.

All that being said, if I will take the time to quote you in context, you said that you "strongly believe games can create as much emotional appeal and attachment as movies do." Which of course is a documented fact. Documented by your own experience, and mine. Video games can certainly have the emmotional appeal and attachment that movies carry; however, I think we can agree that most often they do not.

C

9:56 PM  
Blogger Brandon said...

I think we've gotten a little off track, or maybe I wasn't very clear to begin with. Here's my point, gentlemen: movies are being preserved because people who like movies stood up and said, "Hey - if we're not careful, we might lose the ability to watch some really great movies. Why don't we archive them and make them widely accessible?"

I'm not saying games are better than movies. But the bad thing is, games are not being preserved at all. That's the crime here. I know that Caleb at least has had serious difficulties trying to play an old game on a newer computer. It's a bummer, man, and all I want is to be able to play Castlevania just as easily as I can rent Casablanca on DVD. Except not Castlevania, because it's too hard and it sucks. Maybe Super Castlevania. That game was cool.

3:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well of course movies are being preserved and video games are not. Look how long we have had movies, how many generations have had time to build memories/emotional attachment to certain films. My grandpa will do anything to get some of these old Laurel & Hardy films on VHS or DVD. Video games, really, on the larger mass market, have been around since what? '85?(NES). It's definitely starting to change. But I think once we have a larger market for video games in general and there is more of a demand for the old classics, then it won't really happen.

And it's true that kids today who are growing up with XBox/Gamecube, etc., probably don't have much interest in playing a good 'ol side-scrolling classic. What is the appeal for them? For me, the major appeal of the old NES stuff is pure nostalgia. Good times. Now of course, certain movies merit the same value, i.e. "Goonies". But with movies, it goes beyond just sentimentality. You can take an old-ass movie from the '40's, for example Citizen Kane, and capture the interest of a teenager today. Movies have a broader appeal, they create an emotional attachment to characters and storylines. They are more relatable. No matter how old a movie is, if it engages your logic/emotions, it is interesting. It's human nature to sympathize with people and situations, and I feel that it's more easily done with movies than video games. But I'm not saying that isn't changing. Take a look at all these games today (on the premise that the only current video games I actually play are Mario Tennis and Kart, ha!). However, I have watched Ronnie & Connie play many a game on Gamecube where I swear the "storyline" takes up more time than the actually play time. It seems to me that the game developers, or at least the people in market research, have caught onto the emotional attachment thing. Back in the day, yeah sure I wanted Link to get that piece of the Triforce. But now when princess Zelda stands there and looks me in the eye and tells me I'm her only hope, and flashes back to when the bad guys kidnapped her, etc. etc., well then there's a character and storyline, more pronounced then, say, when that little toad thing in the orginal Super Mario Bros. bounces up and down at the end of each level exclaiming, "Thank you, but the princess is in another castle". Be-otch.

Movies are art that reaches across generational gaps. Until video games have more of that appeal, I just don't think there will be but a small sector of gamers that are willing to put forth the extra effort to preserve them for posterity. It seems that the primary appeal (selling point) for video games is the ooh and aah factor. Kids today have grown up with that and expect that, and probably don't have much appreciation for the old stuff. It's different with movies, because there are intrinsic characters, plots, etc, and even with 'ol black and white, you can still have a bad-ass movie. Additionally, there is such a gap or change in video game technology in the past 20 years that it's probably difficult for young kids to get past the 8-bit graphics. (aannnnd I just realized that I took twice as long to say what Dan just said, oh well).

Ultimately, for these games to be preserved there needs to be a broader market who appreciate them and who will make it profitable for someone to take the initiative to preserve them. Meanwhile, my orginal NES remains hooked up to my tv, in excellent working condition. Of course, every now and then you've gotta blow in the cartridge deck and hit the reset button a couple of times...but isn't that part of the charm? ...and don't mess with me at Dr. Mario!

~Denise

Oh and don't blame girls!

5:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well at this point Brandon's original point has been sadly beaten into the ground.

I agree with you B, at this point I would sign a petition to start a classic gamming society and name y ou as curator of the first museum/game space. AlLso I can see where you are headed...I think. I do appreciate you refining your statements to clarify your intention. I am down.

An interesting couple of side notes:

Far more girls play far more video games than I ever imagined. For some reason I can understand them playing puzzle-type games, and some of the cuter games like MarioKart, but I had no idea that the appeal of adventure and fighting games was a broad as it is (no pun intended). Props to Denise for helping to teach me a great lesson.

Also the new Xbox 360, which will come out this summer according to speculation, ended up with a clean white exterior because Microsoft is trying to appeal to a much broader audience interms of age, sex, and other demographics. I remembered this when Denise mentioned that video game makers seem to be learning to include well-done story-lines for more emmotional appeal.

Might the future include me sitting on the couch enjoying a fully interactive and fascinating video entertainment, that both me and my attractive and intelligent female companion appreciate? Will technology ever progress so far?

Capn' Crunk

10:55 AM  

Post a Comment

5/20/2005



There you have it, folks. My first recorded classical work. Sabrina and Tyler (the pianist) did a great job.

Now, to finish that opera ...

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

I realize it is a very controversial subject (with a lot of ins and a lot of outs), but I am willing to take the bad with the good and pronounce Episode III: Revenge of the Sith as the best movie ever made. Bar none.

I have my reasons, but I won't bother to go into detail. Suffice it to say that the entire experience was truly once-in-a-lifetime. Hats off to Mr Lucas - preferably tri-cornered pirate hats. Arr.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/19/2005



I had forgotten about Target. Rachel wanted to find some Star Wars shirts, so we went there last night. I almost made it out alive. Almost.

On the way out, I remembered that they usually have a rack of underground artists in the CD section. (J: I forgot to mention that this is truly the greatest perk of working there.) They don't have a lot of selection compared to a place like Best Buy, but what they have is amazing. In 30 seconds I had grabbed the new Van Morrison, both new Bright Eyes, the new Spoon, and Bloc Party. The one Bright Eyes record was a ridiculous $7 and the other was $9. Spoon and Bloc Party were on sale for $12 each and my man Van was marked down to $10. I haven't done any listening yet, but as always I will let you, my faithful readers, know.

2 Comments:

Blogger Justin said...

Lemme know what you think of the Bright Eyes. I got a few free tracks on amazon and a couple sounded good, but they had the whole acoustic type album on listen at Vinyl Fever and I wasn't that impressed.

Apparently, on the "Digital" one, dude from the Postal Service helped out. Some reviewers have disliked the hype surrounding ol' Conner, but I'm still not sure if I can get used to his shaky, shaky voice.

Dude, the new Spoon. Bloc Party. Those are definitely on my list under "First Paycheck". Yeah, I recall seeing somewhat underground artists at Target. Cool (no, kyle isn't a manager there).

2:33 PM  
Blogger Brandon said...

I've listened through Spoon, Bloc Party and Van Morrison now. They are all really good. (Van does a couple of blues numbers, not really my thing, but still well done.) Spoon is amazing, they're definitely channeling a Wilco vibe, at least in the first couple songs. Listen to that first track (The Beast and Dragon, Adored) and tell me that lead guitar isn't taken straight from the Wilco bag of tricks. Which I realize can be traced back to George Harrison, but whatever. I was surprised to see that the lead guy (Britt McDaniel) did everything except drums, a la Pedro the Lion.

Bloc Party is tight. What really sold me was the comparison to the Clash on the front sticker. They don't sound like that to me, but there's a lot of cool synth/dance stuff that reminds me of New Order with better melodies.

I haven't opened the Bright Eyes records yet, because I'm not sure I want to. I haven't liked anything about Sir Conor in the past. But I'll probably listen to them soon, just to see what all the hype is about.

3:05 PM  

Post a Comment

5/18/2005

Ticketmaster charges a fee to deliver tickets in electronic form. I've known about this for a long time, but today I realized how idiotic this is. Most airlines have gone the paperless route, charging if you want physical tickets. Credit card companies and banks have incentives in place for customers who choose to view their monthly statements online. But not only does Ticketmaster charge a fee to e-mail your ticket to you, it offers standard rate mail as a free option. (Free being relative of course, since no matter what you're paying $5+ in "processing fees".)

Let me break this down for you. Once I heard that my beloved Peacemakers were going to be in town, I went to their website to find out how to get tickets. I was directed to Ticketmaster. Bracing myself for the worst, I checked out the prices. $10 presale, $12 at the door? Sounds good. Even the $3.50 surcharge wasn't so bad. But by the time I had reached the payment screen, the charges had added up to create a $20 ticket. Twenty dollars! A $3.50 processing fee, some other $3.50 fee, and $3 to actually e-mail the ticket to me so I could print it out.

In a sweeping gesture of stupidity, Ticketmaster single-handedly defeated the whole purpose of raising ticket prices on the day of the show. By getting a ticket at the door, I would actually SAVE EIGHT DOLLARS. I didn't want to risk it being sold out, so I made a bold move: I got in my car and drove down to Kroger where they have a Ticketmaster outlet. That's right. Final ticket price: $14.16. I saved five dollars by getting in my car, killing our environment just a little bit more (if you subscribe to that philosophy), and standing around for 20 minutes while the cashier figured out how to work the Ticketmaster program, which looked like it was written in assembly code circa 1985.

I have no sympathy for Ticketmaster. I refuse to even link to their site like I normally do with my subject matter. I'm certainly in favor of ticket brokers being able to profit from sales, but this is ridiculous. So I'm signing off with a big fat "SUCK IT!" to the fine folks at Ticketmaster.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment



THE BEST BAND EVER is coming to Nashville! Finally, after so many years, I will get to see Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers bring their special version of Southwestern rock right here to the Exit/In. Anyone who's in town on 6/1 should strongly consider joining me. If you're not sure you would like RCPM, go to their website (linked above) and listen to some audio clips. If you're still not sure, I would be happy to make a mix CD for you. If you're STILL not sure, then you are some kind of robot or alien or alien robot, but let me know and we can work something out whereby you go to the show and enjoy it immensely. In fact, IT WILL BE THE BEST SHOW OF YOUR LIFE OR MY MONEY BACK.

(I don't know what that means, but it's fun to shout.)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/17/2005

I am back. Florida was fun, but I am worn out. Props to everyone - Albert is cool. Adam is an author.

I am evaluating Trillian after a request to use MSN Messenger. I spent so long trying to remove that ubiquitous program from my computer that I no longer consider it a valid option. So Trillian it is. I haven't had much luck with third-party messaging programs. There was that little fiasco with Miranda IM a while back, and before that I had tried an early release of Trillian and found it to be very awkward.

Something has changed since then, because Trillian 3.1 is great. Multiple logins and contact lists, automatic e-mail checking (for screen names linked to e-mail accounts), and just a real sweet look to everything. Anyway, more updates as events warrant.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/12/2005



I'd like to thank everyone that made tonight such a resounding success. First of all, Alan gave me the idea. Secondly, Rachel really put things together and helped me to think big and feed the millions of people that ended up coming by for dinner. And last but certainly not least, Caleb, Johannes, Micah, Kim, and Clayton showed up and ate and laughed and watched the Big Lebowski even though it got really hot because we had to turn the A/C off in order to hear the movie.

Which brings me to my next point. Johannes and Micah went with me to get the movie (since I've lost my copy, we had to go rent it), and Micah requested that we stop by Tower so Johannes could buy a magazine for his brother (it was a copy of No Depression with John Prine on it, who I've only recently heard about - I thought it was amazing that someone in Germany was interested in an American alt.country magazine). I told them about my purchasing extravaganza the other night, but felt a bit sheepish when we went inside and the amazing sale was no longer going on. In fact, about 60% of the CD's in the $9.99 rack were gone, and the signs had been taken down. Anyway, I told them it was dangerous to let me in there because I was liable to buy something. This proved true when the clearance singles rack caught my eye. I saw a sweet Morrissey single slashed down to $1.99, but upon closer inspection I found two singles in the regular rack that were priced higher, but included more tracks. So I got those instead. "Redondo Beach" is quite weird, it being a Patti Smith song, and not a very good one in my opinion. Also, it's a live single - the other tracks are "There Is A Light That Never Goes Out" and a new original called "Noise is the Best Revenge" - but it doesn't sound like Morrissey singing at all. Maybe they produced it differently or something (it was recorded for a BBC Radio 1 session), but his voice sounds almost normal. Kind of disappointing.

The other thing that's stupid about it (and this applies to the live DVD too) is that live performances need to reflect the spirit of the original studio track. What this means to me is if you are keeping the same basic arrangement, you must play the song up to tempo. Faster is ok, although groovier stuff will suffer. Slower is absolutely never acceptable. On this single, "There Is A Light" is at least 20 clicks slower than the studio version. I can't bear to listen to it; it feels like the band is just crawling through a huge muddy field, or all spaced out on Valium or something. The emotion and intensity is completely lost. The good news is the DVD is definitely up to speed, although the band always feels like they want to lay back too much on this number. The bad news is the DVD features "The Headmaster Ritual", which I thought was going to be great, but again it's way slower than the studio track and so it just ruins the experience for me.

I also bought "The First of the Gang to Die" single, which I think is a different (studio) recording than the album. (Update: from what I can tell, it's the same recording.) It really rocks - the band likes to slow this one down live, too. Bleah.

The Police never had this problem. That's one thing I think they always did right.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Rachel said...

Don't forget, thanks to Caleb for crying his way through the onion cutting...

4:06 PM  
Blogger Justin said...

Cool, cool. I got all the singles to "You are the quarry" before I got the record. Then I got the record with all the b-sides on it. But, ... so good.

I'm considering getting the live CD, since I heard it was decent, but you're not impressed with the DVD, eh?

8:20 AM  
Blogger Brandon said...

Don't get me wrong - it was entirely worth $12.99. And I want to get the live CD because there's some different tracks on there. A great investment and I think it captures the feeling of the live show. The only complaint was it's a little hard to hear the band, but that might be because of the tiny little mono speaker on my TV. It's in 5.1 I think, which should sound much better.

3:52 PM  

Post a Comment

5/10/2005



Those of you that know me know that I am hardly an alarmist of any kind. Except when it comes to really cool concerts and new releases by my favorite artists. I can get excited about those. But I saw this today, and I couldn't help but wonder what is going on:

REAL ID
REAL ID and judicial review
Special bonus tinfoil hat thread for TotalFarkers

So what this means is that a bill establishing a national ID card for the U.S. was passed unanimously by the Senate without any debate whatsoever - simply because it was added on to an appropriations bill to fund military actions in Iraq. (Don't forget about the delicious restrictions on judicial review that were also tacked on.)

I really don't care what it is; anything that passes the Senate unanimously worries me. Unless it's a motion to establish Ronald Reagan's birthday as a national holiday.

Where are the crazy liberals and/or libertarians when you need them?

2 Comments:

Anonymous Rachel said...

Not to deny the heniousness of the REAL ID provision, but to explain at least in part why the bill passed unanimously...we finally got in some appropriations to take care of soldiers' families and veterans. The max life insurance benefit for service members almost doubled, the death benefit increased ten-fold, and we finally have a pay-off in place for service members who suffer traumatic injuries in battle.

So at least the robbing us of our civil liberties came hand in hand with finally doing something for the people who have been shat on for the last 3 years, rather than just kicking a few more billion back to Halliburton.

9:51 PM  
Blogger Brandon said...

From CNN:

Kennedy said "the so-called Real ID immigration provisions" are "highly controversial, harmful and unnecessary."

But the legislation still passed with a 100-0 vote.


I dunno. That really makes me mad. It seems like an incredible abuse of the system.

3:13 AM  

Post a Comment



Go to the link above. DO IT NOW! Click on the video for "Playa Azul". It is the most amazing thing I have ever seen. These guys are great. Plenty of stuff to see and do on their website, too - the bio is a good read.

Yet another thing I have David Byrne to thank for.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/08/2005



Finally ... some good concert news. My man Van will be performing in the UK in July. I found a show about 40 minutes outside of London - on a Saturday, even - but ticketmaster.co.uk is crapping out errors left and right, so I can't even see how much the tickets are.

2 Comments:

Blogger Brandon said...

Update: the tickets have been purchased, and we're going to see Van Morrison in the courtyard of a 17th century mansion. Rock!

3:01 PM  
Blogger Tina said...

TOOOOOOOOO COOOOOOOL! I love old buildings. I am sooo getting my butt to England sometime in the near future. Well, I got a passport application at least, so that's a start.

6:32 PM  

Post a Comment

5/05/2005



So we went to Chili's, and then Tower Records - two places I wasn't very keen on going, but Caleb had gift cards for both. So we have a bang-up time at Chili's talking about the death of pop music (it's a nice thing to think about) and then saunter over to Tower. I did not expect to find anything worth buying; rather, I should say I did not expect to find anything reasonably priced. But they had 4 entire racks of recent stuff for $9.99. I couldn't believe it. My initial choice of about 12 records was whittled down to Wilco's "Being There" (an even greater deal since it's a double record), Gram Parsons' "GP" and "Grievous Angel" (another double disc!), and the best of Van Morrison, vol. 2 (since I already knew most of the songs on the first one). On the way out, I saw the new Morrissey DVD and ... THE NEW RYAN ADAMS!!! FOR ONLY $12.99!!!

Three double albums later, I am in the mood to clean this place up. And that's a good thing, because, man - it sure does need it.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

5/03/2005

This is my assignment from class today. I kid you not.
[Note: after my hosting account was hacked and reset, I was unable to find a copy of the picture in this post. Sorry.]

0 Comments:

Post a Comment